Orientation in the Unsiverse

Orientation in the Unsiverse

In defining the whole area of the universe and for the sake of orientation within it, I have sectionalized it as No.1 below. Such a depiction of upper and lower parts of the universe may seem simplistic but I hope it serves the purpose i.e. of orientation.

If I describe an area of 1.6 of each 2,4,5 section of the 'upper' area of the universe, I would be indicating the whole of square one and 0.6 of its adjoining boxes. This would be the maximum distance depicted in previous posts of 3000 billion, trillion, trillion square miles. One also sees here that width or sideways intention is, at least, spatially unlimited.

By writing that the calculations relate to all of the initial square, i.e. square one and 0.6 of the adjoining squares one gets a more involved impression of an area. However, I am drawing on a flat two dimensional equivalent picture of the universe with a left and right and up and down. This initially seems unavoidable. I am also pinpointing an area of the universe in my mind which lies in an upper left part of the universe if it could be so depicted. It is however really middle right.

I am indicating that the initial assessment or fundamental point or moment of the specific desired destination is within the one i.e. the top left square and its radius.

The latter is an area of spatial and temporal assessment of being within proceeding and preceeding posed positions. The radial curve seen and assessed by earth dimensions is however at 0.25 of the adjoining squares. This is if the destination is 3000 billion, trillion, trillion miles from earth. This makes the identifiable point 1.25 of the upper left part.

The difference of 0.35 involves the spatial bending and curving in outer space at that position and within a surrounding area which is relativsed to it´s distance to earth i.e. 6:1.

The differing 0.35 is a result of vision voltage and other sense comprehension factors. The difference also has the expansion rate of the universe as well as gravitation factors prevalent in the identified area calculated into it.

After defining any area within space using the box system, the diamond locator (dl) is then used in order to define exactly the desired point wanted. As mentioned in previous posts the centre of the dl fixes on a certain point and one of the A,B,C quarters or the dl have within them the desired area or place aimed for. The point the dl fixes on involves the actual destination and the A,B,C quarters relate to the same point having calculated time and gravity factors within them, especially those involved in hostile areas.

It brings a desired location to the front in respect of the depth indicated by any set of successive squares or in fact as indicated by the dl itself. Of course we are often dealing with a new depth dimension (see blog).

Each square is usually at the above maximum distance and has a rate of increase in size of 3.02 inches per trillion miles, which is its related size to the expanding universe.

Each square in the set of orientation boxes is a maximum of one string and therefore has the said maximum assessment. However, because of Raum variances at that distance, the universe is measured in depth expansion, i.e., by successive square frames, which succeed the original depicted squares.

This is similar as I have outlined previously to depicting reality generally. However, in such circumstances as depicted above further depth (distance) squares are extended to the left of each square in an unlimited fashion.

This last point is calculated knit in with the calculations of the massive gravity of the potential within the 'Nothing' beyond the borders of our expanding universe (see early post).

To return to the difference between the 0.6 and 0.25 as mentioned above concerning the orientating boxes for the universe I would say it is a distance in terms of Time. It is a constant ratioed comparison to the distance between the 'on' particles of the fractal pattern at the border of the universe, (see early post). This latter concern is described basically by my O within my 36er system, as the 'on' particles regulate the pace of the growing universe and the amount of potential that can seep past the 'on' particles from the nothing at the other side of the borders.

The distance to the border of the universe from the point of destination, which as mentioned in this case is a maximum of 3 million, trillion, trillion square miles from earth and at the said distance i.e. 6:1 to any other point at such a distance is to be ratioed in comparison to the 0.35 difference and the said expansion rate of the universe. The latter, as stated, depends on the interaction of the 'on' particles.

The difference in the proximity of the 'on' particles to each other may be minute but the Time areas which relate to any difference between the said particles is often extremly big. This is perhaps because the edge is so big and contains so many 'on' particles. Here we could see the primal relationship between big and small.

Ten degrees of bending which extend for two thirds of a circumference in any area within a trillion miles of the desired area alters the measurement between 'on' particles by one degree i.e. 0.2 cm more added to each of the adjoining boxes.

The above rules can be applied to any box in order to identify any area within the universe.

No.1