Orientation in the Unsiverse
In
defining the whole area of the universe and for the sake of
orientation within it, I have sectionalized it as No.1 below. Such a
depiction of upper and lower parts of the universe may seem
simplistic but I hope it serves the purpose i.e. of orientation.
If
I describe an area of 1.6 of each 2,4,5 section of the 'upper' area
of the universe, I would be indicating the whole of square one and
0.6 of its adjoining boxes. This would be the maximum distance
depicted in previous posts of 3000 billion, trillion, trillion square
miles. One also sees here that width or sideways intention is, at
least, spatially unlimited.
By
writing that the calculations relate to all of the initial square,
i.e. square one and 0.6 of the adjoining squares one gets a more
involved impression of an area. However, I am drawing on a flat two
dimensional equivalent picture of the universe with a left and right
and up and down. This initially seems unavoidable. I am also
pinpointing an area of the universe in my mind which lies in an upper
left part of the universe if it could be so depicted. It is however
really middle right.
I
am indicating that the initial assessment or fundamental point or
moment of the specific desired destination is within the one i.e. the
top left square and its radius.
The
latter is an area of spatial and temporal assessment of being within
proceeding and preceeding posed positions. The radial curve seen and
assessed by earth dimensions is however at 0.25 of the adjoining
squares. This is if the destination is 3000 billion, trillion,
trillion miles from earth. This makes the identifiable point 1.25 of
the upper left part.
The
difference of 0.35 involves the spatial bending and curving in outer
space at that position and within a surrounding area which is
relativsed to it´s distance to earth i.e. 6:1.
The
differing 0.35 is a result of vision voltage and other sense
comprehension factors. The difference also has the expansion rate of
the universe as well as gravitation factors prevalent in the
identified area calculated into it.
After
defining any area within space using the box system, the diamond
locator (dl) is then used in order to define exactly the desired
point wanted. As mentioned in previous posts the centre of the dl
fixes on a certain point and one of the A,B,C quarters or the dl have
within them the desired area or place aimed for. The point the dl
fixes on involves the actual destination and the A,B,C quarters
relate to the same point having calculated time and gravity factors
within them, especially those involved in hostile areas.
It
brings a desired location to the front in respect of the depth
indicated by any set of successive squares or in fact as indicated by
the dl itself. Of course we are often dealing with a new depth
dimension (see blog).
Each
square is usually at the above maximum distance and has a rate of
increase in size of 3.02 inches per trillion miles, which is its
related size to the expanding universe.
Each
square in the set of orientation boxes is a maximum of one string and
therefore has the said maximum assessment. However, because of Raum
variances at that distance, the universe is measured in depth
expansion, i.e., by successive square frames, which succeed the
original depicted squares.
This
is similar as I have outlined previously to depicting reality
generally. However, in such circumstances as depicted above further
depth (distance) squares are extended to the left of each square in
an unlimited fashion.
This
last point is calculated knit in with the calculations of the massive
gravity of the potential within the 'Nothing' beyond the borders of
our expanding universe (see early post).
To
return to the difference between the 0.6 and 0.25 as mentioned above
concerning the orientating boxes for the universe I would say it is a
distance in terms of Time. It is a constant ratioed comparison to the
distance between the 'on' particles of the fractal pattern at the
border of the universe, (see early post). This latter concern is
described basically by my O within my 36er system, as the 'on'
particles regulate the pace of the growing universe and the amount of
potential that can seep past the 'on' particles from the nothing at
the other side of the borders.
The
distance to the border of the universe from the point of destination,
which as mentioned in this case is a maximum of 3 million, trillion,
trillion square miles from earth and at the said distance i.e. 6:1 to
any other point at such a distance is to be ratioed in comparison to
the 0.35 difference and the said expansion rate of the universe. The
latter, as stated, depends on the interaction of the 'on' particles.
The
difference in the proximity of the 'on' particles to each other may
be minute but the Time areas which relate to any difference between
the said particles is often extremly big. This is perhaps because the
edge is so big and contains so many 'on' particles. Here we could see
the primal relationship between big and small.
Ten
degrees of bending which extend for two thirds of a circumference in
any area within a trillion miles of the desired area alters the
measurement between 'on' particles by one degree i.e. 0.2 cm more
added to each of the adjoining boxes.
The
above rules can be applied to any box in order to identify any area
within the universe.
No.1
